<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital v film on Corpse Bride</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.batflattery.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=36" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.batflattery.com/?p=36</link>
	<description>Techno-fatigue sets in</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 16:41:53 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PooterGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.batflattery.com/?p=36&#038;cpage=1#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>PooterGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.batflattery.com/?p=36#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Fair enough. It&#039;s a weird feeling when you move an old blog and zombie posts start pinging other blogs as if they&#039;d just been written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough. It&#8217;s a weird feeling when you move an old blog and zombie posts start pinging other blogs as if they&#8217;d just been written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.batflattery.com/?p=36&#038;cpage=1#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.batflattery.com/?p=36#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I suppose that, based on that single sentence, what I said is a misinterpretation of our exchange. I believe it&#039;s a lot more representative of the thrust of your original post, however, although I appreciate now that you were exaggerating to some extent for comic effect.

I say &quot;now&quot; because I wrote the original post some time ago and it has only now come to your notice because I switched my blog from Blogger to Wordpress: when I imported all my old posts, Wordpress obviously went off and did all the pingback stuff that I confess I am unused to, as Blogger does not participate in it. 

Let me just say now that it&#039;s slightly embarrassing to read the words of my younger self on your blog, and I think I&#039;ve calmed down a bit since then!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I suppose that, based on that single sentence, what I said is a misinterpretation of our exchange. I believe it&#8217;s a lot more representative of the thrust of your original post, however, although I appreciate now that you were exaggerating to some extent for comic effect.</p>
<p>I say &#8220;now&#8221; because I wrote the original post some time ago and it has only now come to your notice because I switched my blog from Blogger to Wordpress: when I imported all my old posts, Wordpress obviously went off and did all the pingback stuff that I confess I am unused to, as Blogger does not participate in it. </p>
<p>Let me just say now that it&#8217;s slightly embarrassing to read the words of my younger self on your blog, and I think I&#8217;ve calmed down a bit since then!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PooterGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.batflattery.com/?p=36&#038;cpage=1#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>PooterGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.batflattery.com/?p=36#comment-70</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;he remained stubbornly of the opinion that film would forever remain superior to digital imaging.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s a funny way of interpreting what I actually wrote during our exchange:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Once CCDs in digital SLRs are big enough and sensitive enough then film will die forever&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The rumours are that Sony will be bringing out a full-frame dSLR (that can take my lenses) soon. As soon as I can afford one then I&#039;ll buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>he remained stubbornly of the opinion that film would forever remain superior to digital imaging.</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s a funny way of interpreting what I actually wrote during our exchange:</p>
<blockquote><p>Once CCDs in digital SLRs are big enough and sensitive enough then film will die forever</p></blockquote>
<p>The rumours are that Sony will be bringing out a full-frame dSLR (that can take my lenses) soon. As soon as I can afford one then I&#8217;ll buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
