Continue to move the slider until you find your desired width.


Archive for the 'cars & bikes' Category

Muscle cars, supercars, and superbikes

Thursday, August 16th, 2007

In this discussion at Gary’s gaff, certain people have been asking pointed questions about the cornering and stopping abilities of American muscle cars. Is it true that your average Porsche outhandles your average Mustang? Certainly. Of that there is no doubt. The Porsche is designed from scratch by sports-car engineers to handle well. It’s got decades of such design experience behind it. There are few compromises entertained by its engineers when it comes to performance and handling.

(more…)

Bumblebee in Transformers: the 2009 Camaro

Wednesday, August 15th, 2007

Transformers Bumblebee CamaroI saw Transformers last week: not brilliant but certainly enjoyable. The bits that made me grin the most starred the yellow Autobot Bumblebee, at least when he was in his guise of a yellow Camaro. At first he’s a model that has seen better days, but then he, um, transforms into a very sleek-looking Camaro indeed.

Now I didn’t realise this at the time, but it seems that the car is supposed to be the 2009 Chevy Camaro. Since that model doesn’t actually exist yet, GM had a specialty car company graft fibreglass mouldings of their new Camaro concept car onto the running gear of a Pontiac GTO from Australia. All the gory details are here, together with some more pictures.

Clarkson drives to the North Pole

Wednesday, July 25th, 2007

Yes! He did it! Clarkson and Captain Slow have become the first people to drive to the (magnetic) North Pole! They did it in a magnificent Toyota Hilux pickup, beating the Hamster in a dogsled. Yay!

It’s a great moment for petrolheads everywhere. And, as JC says at the end, about the supposed environmental damage, the inconvenient truth is that they left barely a scratch.

The market will take care of it. As it always has.

Monday, March 26th, 2007

Was thinking a bit more about the Tesla and my reaction to it, which is similar to my reaction to low-energy lamps. I buy the latter, not because I give a sod about so-called global warming, but because they last longer (hate changing the buggers) and cost less to run. When LED bulbs finally become available I’ll buy them because they last forever (yay!).

In the same way, I would buy a Tesla (if I had £50k to spend on a car) because it’s a fantastic performance machine, looks cool (you can see Lotus are involved) and it costs less to run. Starting to see a pattern here? If you serve a real need, offer a real advantage, people will want your product. No hectoring required.

And this explains my basic antipathy to the global warming bandwagon. It’s stuffed with people who live to hector, who can’t be bothered finding out what people want because they’re so busy telling them what they ought to want. The antipathy to the market is most marked, I think, in those who have the guilty knowledge, deep down, that what they want is not what most people want. And therefore they have to avoid, at all costs, any mechanism for making that fact known, while promoting any scheme, from socialism to anti-discrimination to environmentalism, that gives them license to tell other people what to do.

Prius damages environment more than Hummer

Monday, March 26th, 2007

The darling of the eco-poser set, the supposedly super-efficient (and super-expensive) Toyota Prius is the most environmentally damaging car to build. And it takes five years for the petrol savings to offset its high price. By which time the battery is probably dead.

Me, I’m buying a Tesla. As soon as I win the lottery.

A cheat?

Friday, January 27th, 2006

Why does The Sun have a picture of a cheetah on top of a Jaguar in this article? I’m used to their very high standards of journalism, so I find it hard to believe it’s an error. Perhaps it’s an ironic comment of sorts, or a knowing in-joke? Can anyone help?